Lately I've seen loads of people spelling 'writing' as 'writting'.
This makes even less sense to me than people spelling 'lose' as 'loose' (which I've already ranted about, though not here... xP). I mean... really? Don't you know the rule of vowels? They're only long if there's only one consenant between the two of them.
Yet I've seen people on Wajas trying to hire 'writters', people asking for this 'writting' on their tag, kids in Honors English classes writing about how they dream of being 'writters' when they grow up, and so on.
Good luck with that, when you can't even spell the name of your hopeful occupation. I can spell paleontologist, and that's a heck of a lot more complicated. You're taking away an 'e' and adding an 'ing' to 'write', and that's adding 'paleo' to 'ologist', where the 't' in the middle comes from I don't even know, but it's there.
Yeah... I don't even know. Although I lot of the people I see saying 'writting' also have writing full of 'plz, mcuh, or i', I've seen plenty who seem like perfectly able writers until they start repeatedly throwing that extra 't' in.
Stop being stupid. -.-
~~~
This, on the other hand, made my day, despite the errors:
"how annoying is it that the vast majority of a certain group of people who deny the existence of a certain universal being seem to think that it's perfectly logical to prove a universal negative?
example of a universal negative:There is no such thing as Santa Claus.
You can't prove this to be true, unless you have an immediate knowledge of ever crack and corner of the entire universe, and can see no Santa Claus there. aka, are omnipresent, aka are God.
so why in the WORLD do these people, whom I might add consider themselves to be supremely logical, execute this logical blunder with such blatant assumption of correctness"
~Within My Grasp (Wajas user)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment